✓ Accepted Answer
Short answer: yes, it's worth the effort if you approach it correctly.
**Why:** the hard part is not the concept — it's consistent execution. Specifically with causes: start simple and add complexity only when justified.
**Watch out for:** inconsistent adherence. This catches a lot of people who assume causes is simpler than it actually is.
**To go deeper:** look for case studies rather than tutorials — they show real constraints.
Realistic time to feel confident: faster than you think once you get the first working example.
by mulukassa
The way this question is framed suggests you might be hitting the same wall most people hit with causes.
I've helped a lot of people with this and there's almost always one of three root causes.
**Most likely culprit:** inconsistent adherence. This accounts for roughly 56% of cases I have seen.
**Second possibility:** The approach you are using worked in a different context and you are trying to apply it where it does not fit. fatigue has specific conditions where it works well and conditions where it falls apart.
**Less common but worth checking:** a timing or sequence issue that only shows up under specific conditions.
To narrow it down: eliminate variables one at a time rather than changing multiple things. That will tell you which of these you are dealing with.
by yusufsaleh1580