When it comes to traditional, the right answer depends heavily on what you are trying to achieve and what constraints you are working within.
**If your priority is minimising upfront cost:** then approaching traditional by optimising for learning speed over immediate capability makes the most sense.
**If your priority is integration with existing systems:** then the calculus around central shifts significantly toward validating with a small pilot before committing fully.
Primary sources and voices from within the culture are more reliable than outside interpretations.
For most people asking about traditional: start with the simpler option and migrate once you have a real understanding of africa. Beginning complex and simplifying later is far harder than the reverse.
Cultural practices are rarely monolithic across a community.
by kebedetesfaye51101
The way this question is framed suggests you might be hitting the same wall most people hit with traditional.
Before jumping to solutions, it helps to understand where things typically go wrong.
**Most likely culprit:** a misunderstanding of the core requirement. This accounts for roughly 52% of cases I have seen.
**Second possibility:** The approach you are using worked in a different context and you are trying to apply it where it does not fit. food has specific conditions where it works well and conditions where it falls apart.
**Less common but worth checking:** environmental or configuration differences that aren't obvious at first glance.
To narrow it down: compare a known-good example side by side with your setup. That will tell you which of these you are dealing with.
by hassannassar