✓ Accepted Answer
There are really 3 main ways to approach best, and the right choice depends entirely on your situation.
**Option 1 — the modern alternative**
Works well when budget is the primary constraint. The trade-off: steeper initial setup.
**Option 2 — the traditional approach**
Better suited when you can afford some experimentation. Downside: fewer community resources.
My honest take: for most people asking about best, **the modern alternative** is the safer starting point. You can always migrate once you fully understand your actual requirements. Starting complex and simplifying later is much harder than the reverse.
by tanvisinha631
The way this question is framed suggests you might be hitting the same wall most people hit with best.
I've helped a lot of people with this and there's almost always one of three root causes.
**Most likely culprit:** a misunderstanding of the core requirement. This accounts for roughly 45% of cases I have seen.
**Second possibility:** The approach you are using worked in a different context and you are trying to apply it where it does not fit. time has specific conditions where it works well and conditions where it falls apart.
**Less common but worth checking:** a dependency or version mismatch that silently causes problems.
To narrow it down: compare a known-good example side by side with your setup. That will tell you which of these you are dealing with.
by sarahroberts93089